Deuteronomy 22:21 they shall reveal the damsel on the home of the lady father’s home
Judges 19:2 And his concubine starred the whore against him, and gone away from your unto their dad’s home to Bethlehemjudah, and is there four whole period.
Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these terms toward the north, and state, Go Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith the father; and that I will likely not result in mine outrage to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the LORD, and that I won’t hold outrage for everaˆ¦
Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith god, return unto me personally: of course thou wilt put away thine abominations of my personal sight, subsequently shalt thou maybe not removeaˆ¦
Jeremiah 8:4-6 Moreover thou shalt state unto them, hence saith god
They state. –Better, So to speak, as bringing in a new application of the figure. The direct reference should Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the return to the last spouse as an abomination, a law which the present breakthrough with the guide regarding the rules (2Kings 22:10-11) got most likely put into prominence. But there is also a clear allusion with the want imagery in Hosea. There the prophet had done, virtually or perhaps in parable, just what legislation got forbidden (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), and so got conducted from chance of return as well as the hope of pardon. Jeremiah has to play a sterner component is guyspy free. in order to improve apostate adulteress no less than feel that she have sinned also profoundly having any states forgiveness. It could manage just as if Jehovah cannot today go back to the passion for their espousals, making their exactly what she when was basically.
But come back once again to me, saith the father. –The words noise in English like a gracious invitation, and–in spite of this authority of a lot interpreters taking it as an indignant exclamation, and return to me! an invite given in paradox, and comparable to getting rejected, as though that return happened to be from the question–it must, I think, become therefore used. The prophet has actually, even as we have observed, the history of Hosea in his mind, in which there was this type of a phone call to return (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), and also refers to it and repeats they in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It certainly indicates a want of understanding of the smoothness of Jeremiah to suppose that the guy ever arrived before males as announcing an irrevocable condemnation, excluding the possibility of repentance.
Verse 1. – they do say , etc.; because margin of Authorized Version properly states, the Hebrew just have “stating.” Various innovative attempts were made to spell out this. Hitzig, by way of example, with Dr. Payne Smith, thinks that “claiming” may be a silly similar for “in other words,” “for example,” and/or similar; as the Vulgate and Rashi, accompanied by De Wette and RosenmA?ller, assume an ellipsis, and render, “really frequently said,” or “i would state.” But much the absolute most natural method is to suppose that “saying” is actually a fragment from the superscription in the prophecy, the remaining of which was accidentally positioned in ver. 6, and therefore we ought to see, “additionally the word of the Lord emerged unto me personally when you look at the times of Josiah the master, saying.” Very J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If one put away his girlfriend . The debate are launched throughout the rules of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite that has divorced his girlfriend to take the woman once again, if for the period she was indeed partnered to a different. The Jews got damaged a still more sacred wrap, maybe not once best, but over and over; they worshipped “gods most and lords many;” so that they had no lengthier any declare on Jehovah in advantage of his “covenant” along with his someone. Shall the guy come back , etc.? fairly, Ought he to go back? The force associated with the name is possible (comp. Authorized type of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought to not be performed”). Shall not in the next term is rather wouldn’t . Yet come back once again for me. Therefore Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, therefore the view might seem as verified from the invitations in vers. 12, 14, 22. But as it is demonstrably contradictory aided by the debate regarding the verse, so that as the verb may equally very well be the infinitive or even the essential, most recent commentators make, “And thinkest thou to return if you ask me?” (practically, and going back to me! implying the very concept is inconceivable). Most likely Jeremiah was conscious that most Jews are dissatisfied aided by the religious condition on the country (comp. ver. 4).